Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 01 Apr 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone * Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault * David Banas, Xilinx Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock * Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy Huang Chunxing, Huawei Technologies John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic * Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft * Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: AR: Mike invite Walter Katz to talk about measurements BIRDs - TBD New items: - Mike: please send emails feedback on JEITA response document - Lance spoke with Anders Eckholm. - Would like to discuss golden waveform proposal - Anders: - oshoot/ushoot for function and destruction - requires 2 values AR: Mike add Anders Ekholm to ibis-quality email list Presentation by Guan Tao "Measurement Correlation": - Suggestions for correlation of IBIS to source data - Correlation procedure is specified in IBIS Accuracy Handbook. - Golden waveforms are not required for this method. - It is difficult for IBIS users to correlate, model makers should do it. - Huawei procedure: - Compare measurements on real boards (not test boards) with IBIS - Choose net with low crosstalk and ground bounce - Probe near receiver pin - Produce an internal report - David: complex test fixture may introduce interconnect characterization error - Mike: Need to simulate with probe parasitics for good match - Lance: Often see a difference when simulating with interconnect - Moshiul: How good is the correlation? - Guan: IBIS correlation is good - Mike: How do we know where the board falls with regard to FTS? - Guan: it should fall somewhere between the F and S corners - Only need to check that it is within limits - David: Are we assuming the receiver model is accurate? - Guan: The receiver model does not affect the results much. - Lance: Driver & receiver C_comp can be different - Mike: We can have separate I and O models using [Model Selector] - Can [Submodel] automate the driver/receiver C_comp difference? - Bob: [Submodel] has no C_comp - David: Has Guan seen the related presentation by David & Roy? - Very detailed on definitions of measurements - David will send this to Guan - David: suggest changing ((Test-Simulate)/Test) to ((Simulate-Test)/Test) - Guan: Reports are formatted into a spreadsheet with pictures. - Anders: There is a scope bandwidth issue that must be considered. AR: David send David & Roy correlation presentation to Guan - Next week we will discuss the golden waveform and overshoot/undershoot issues brought up in this meeting but not discussed. - David suggested discussing and comparing in the April 15 meeting: - Presentations from Guan - Presentation from David & Roy - IQ specification section 7 text Next meeting: 08 Apr 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:09 PM Eastern Time.